The Online Resource for the Painting Industry

Taking Your Work Home With You

By on April 29, 2012 in Lead Paint with 12 Comments

I’m in the middle of a Elevated Blood Lead Investigation.  This is where I try and find the source or sources that caused the lead poisoning of a child.  One suspect is a painter who transferred lead dust from his clothes to the family car and then that dust was transferred to his wife’s clothing and ultimately to the lead poisoned child, whom she is the nanny for.

During my research, I came across these case studies, which may be of interest to some.

Case 1:  In September 2008, a male aged 12 months with a BLL of 18 µg/dL was reported to MCLPPP; the boyfriend of the child’s mother worked for a painting and paint-removal contractor. The mother’s boyfriend was transported to and from work in her vehicle with the child in the car. No lead paint or lead dust was detected in the family home in a 1980s public housing complex. The mother’s vehicle had a lead dust level of 2,100 µg/ft2 on the passenger seat, and the child’s toddler safety seat had a lead dust level of 120 µg/ft2. The car was cleaned commercially and the mother reported vacuuming and wet cleaning the interior. The mother replaced the vehicle when follow-up testing in November indicated lead dust on the passenger seat (1,000 µg/ft2) The child safety seat was replaced and upon retesting in May 2009, the child’s BLL decreased to 7 µg/dL.

Case 2:  In April 2008, a female aged 28 months with a BLL of 12 µg/dL was reported to MCLPPP; upon retesting in May, her BLL had increased to 22 µg/dL. Her father was employed in paint removal (by sanding and grinding) in an 1860s building. The paint tested positive for lead when the father tested it with a home lead test kit. The father’s BLL was 71 µg/dL. The family did not own a vehicle and resided in a 1920s building that had been renovated in 1984. No lead paint was found inside the home; lead dust levels of 1,200 µg/ft2 were detected in the entryway to the exterior laundry room where work clothes and shoes were typically removed. The child’s safety seat, kept in the same hallway, had a lead dust level of 100 µg/ft2. The family discarded the seat; when the child was retested in June, her BLL had decreased to <5 µg/dL.

Case 3:  In January 2008, a female aged 13 months with a BLL of 15 µg/dL was reported to the Maine Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Program (MCLPPP); her father’s previous occupation involved sanding and grinding paint from pre-1950s residential buildings. According to the father, the employer only required workers to wear dust masks and therefore did not adhere to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s lead-removal safety standards. No lead paint or lead dust was identified in the child’s home (a 1990s mobile home). Lead dust wipes of the family’s only vehicle, which was used to drive to job sites, identified lead dust on the driver’s seat (550 µg/ft2) and on the infant child safety seat (43 µg/ft2) that had been kept continuously (from birth to age 13 months) in the vehicle. A sibling aged 3 years who used a booster seat that was kept inside the home when not in use, had a BLL of <5 µg/dL. Both child safety seats were replaced and the vehicle was vacuumed and wet cleaned; upon retesting 7 months later, the affected child (at age 20 months) had a BLL of <5 µg/dL.

Case 4:  In April 2008, a male aged 18 months with a BLL of 22 µg/dL was reported to MCLPPP; his father had worked for 10 months for a particular contractor. The boy’s father routinely picked his child up from a state-licensed child care facility in his work clothes during his employment. No lead paint or lead dust was identified in the 1978 public housing complex in which the family had resided since March 2008. Lead dust wipes of the family vehicle detected lead levels of 240 µg/ft2 on the truck floor and 95 µg/ft2 on the child’s safety seat. The child safety seat was replaced. The vehicle was vacuumed and wet cleaned. Follow-up BLLs were 13 µg/dL in December 2008 and 11 µg/dL in March 2009.

Long story short, we may want to take better precautions, not only for our own family’s sake, but for others safety too.

Print Friendly
(Visited 54 times, 1 visits today)
Dean Lovvorn
Dean Lovvorn is a Lead Based Paint Specialist working in the Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas area. He is a licensed lead inspector, EPA certified renovator and a RRP Instructor. Dean also administers a private discussion group comprised of RRP Instructors, EPA-HUD-CDC professionals, Lead Inspectors & Assessors, City-County-State Health Departments, Universities and lead organizations.
Dean Lovvorn

Latest posts by Dean Lovvorn (see all)

Tags: ,

Subscribe

If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

There Are 12 Brilliant Comments

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

Sites That Link to this Post

  1. Families of Painters and Contractors Beware! | May 1, 2012
  2. Treating lead exposure | October 5, 2012
  1. Great article. People do not understand the severe danger that lead dust brings to ourselves and our loved ones.

    • Dean Lovvorn says:

      Appreciate it. I think for most contractors (and homeowners), seeing is believing. What many may not realize is damage can happen and you or your loved one will “feel” just fine. Inside the brain however … is a different story.

  2. I think this is a great article, since I have a lot of moms who read my site, I shared your link to my readers!
    Thanks for the great information. We can so easily think something is no big deal. When really it is a huge deal.

    • Dean Lovvorn says:

      Appreciate it Robin. We now have sufficient evidence to show that LESS than 5 micro-grams per deciliter in the blood can damage a young child. All your moms should insist from their pediatrician to do a lead blood test once a year … at least until age 6.

      Interestingly, the EBL Investigation I mentioned in the article is a lead poisoned 2 year old that lives in a home built in 2001. Way after lead based paint was banned.

  3. John,

    a cautionary post, thank you.
    We had our own scare with elevated blood lead levels after having our windows cleaned; the crew aggressively bladed the old paint off the glass and left paint chips all over our home – my son’s levels were spiked at his next testing.
    As painting contractors working in the Boston area we have used HEPA filtered vacuums for over a decade; implementing the RRP protocols have helped us step up our levels of protection. Now we use negative air machines – these help with productivity immensely and are well worth the investment.

  4. Dean,

    Good article, I appreciate it. Here’s something I can hang my hat on when I’m telling the boys why we will do what I am telling them we will do. Go ahead, complain about Tyvek suits, etc. now! We maintain the position that lead or not, RRP provides a blueprint for how we will manage our projects, how we CHOOSE to take care of our customers and our employees.

    Thanks,
    Denis

    • Dean Lovvorn says:

      Denis,

      Thanks! I’m getting together another study showing how much lead is on the truck seat, arm rest and floor board. Plus, how much is distributed (from clothing) to each room of the house when a painter comes home and changes clothes.

      Fascinating stuff … for a lead geek 🙂

We would love to hear what you think!

Top